Warning Russia About Terror Attacks

US propagnda is now claiming that the US "warned" Russia about an upcoming terror attack, but Russia ignored them. Therefore, you see, the 140 are all the fault of Putin (in US propaganda).

The original attack was planned to disrupt the Russian elections, and was to take place at the Crocus Hall during the Shaman concert on March 9th. The alert issued by the US was very specific, "in the next 48 hours". By all accounts, the security was very, very heavy that night. The speculation is that it dissuaded the terrorists, one of whom was photographed before that night at the hall. Obviously, the Russians did take the warning seriously. But no one said anyone about a terror attack after the election, when it would seem to be moot. Except that, of course, the US immediately said that this attack, which showed Putin's impotence, would surely lead to regime change. Because that's how they "think".

The Mighty Wurlitzer dropped the meaning of the acronym of ISIS when they moved them out to attack other enemies of the US. When "ISIS", Islamic State for IRAQ and SYRIA, showed up in the Philippines, when Duarte displeased the US, i wondered how anyone could fall for it. And yet......

Early in the Trump presidency, Trump warned Russia about an "ISIS" plot to blow up a Russian plane.

The Mighty Wurlitzer went wild with rage, and the entire Establishment denounced Trump and called him a "traitor", for saving the lives of Russian civilians.

Obama The Great certainly didn't do that in October 2015, shortly after Russia came to the rescue of Syria, and the response was to blow up a civilian plane, killing 224 Russians, including children. Why couldn't Trump be more like Obama?

According to the Blob, "protecting sources" was far more important than saving lives. Yes, that is what they said.

But now we are told by the same sources that the US gave a warning to Russia about the "ISIS" attack in Moscow, and the Russians ignored it, because "Putin Evil" (like Trump, his co-conspirator, doncha know.)

I call bullshit.

Why Was Victoria Nuland Sacked?

There are rumors that Nuland might have been conspiring with Budanov to set off a dirty bomb, and that might be why they axed her. That would, indeed, be a ''nasty surprise'', and I have no doubt that she is capable of planning such a thing.

Hmm, that is an interesting theory. So far, the US has blamed the destruction of the Nordstream pipelines on Budanov, and nothing happened.

Then the NY Times did an "expose" about the CIA setting up bases and cooperating with the GUR to terrorize dissidents, including fingering Budanov for the murders of Motorola and Givi, and the murders of Russians in Russia, like Daria Dugina. Nothing happened.

Or did it? Is the forcing out of Cookies a first step? If Budanov has an untimely unfortunate event, I will conclude that there are rational people somewhere in the upper echelon of the Deep State who do not want war with Russia, and more importantly, have the power to stop it.

We'll see.

Managing the Public

West: We will send troops to Ukraine to fight Russia, but we will also send missiles that will go deep into Russian territory. We will not just attack critical infrastructure in Russia, we will target civilians.

Russia: If you do that, we will respond.

West: Russia threatened us with nuclear weapons!!! Putin is a mad man!

Kiev Coup Anniversary

Today is the 10th anniversary of the US-backed coup in Kiev.

This coup is referred to in the newspeak concocted by the spinmasters as The Revolution of Dignity.

State Dept. goon Victoria Nuland (now second in command) was caught on tape with the US ambassador discussing who the US would place into power in the post-coup government. This is referred to in newspeak as "Ukraine's national sovereignty".

The new government promptly outlawed being Russian in Ukraine, leading to the rebellion of the citizens of Crimea and the Donbass. This is referred to in Mighty Wurlitzer newspeak as ''the Russian invasion".

The subsequent attacks by the post-coup US-backed Kiev regime onto the citizens of Donbass is called "anti-terrorist operations." The invasion and occupation of 150,000 Kiev regime forces into NATO built fortifications in the Donbass is called "protecting borders."

The entrance of actual Russian forces into the civil war, to stop the Kiev regime forces from escalating the war, and trying to kill or push out the millions of people there, is called "Putin's unprovoked brutal invasion."

We live in the Empire of Lies.

The Shining City On The Hill Looking A Bit Scruffy

Our ruling overlords are having a meltdown over the Tucker Carlson interview with Putin, but even more over the video TC released the next day, showing how beautiful and liveable Moscow is. They are calling him a traitor and implying that they might Assange him.

According to them, if you think that having millions of people living on the streets because they can't afford rent is wrong, you are a traitor.

If you don't like to walk over bodies on those streets, stepping into feces, or dodging used syringes, you are a traitor.

If you think clean and fast subways with art in the stations are preferable to filthy stations in which you might randomly be pushed in front of an oncoming train, you are a traitor.

If you like plentiful and affordable food instead of high priced GMO food laden with corn syrup, you are a traitor.

If you are impressed by clean and safe streets, with beautiful architecture, instead of urine-soaked and dangerous streets, lined with boarded-up windows, you are a traitor. Heretic! Throw him into the dungeon!

How To Stay In Syria and Iraq

The US announces that a strike on a base (in Jordan, so they say) killed 3 US soldiers.

There have been strikes on (illegal) US bases in Syria and Iraq, but up until now, the US has claimed that no one got killed. Why change the story now?

For the last few days we have been hearing rumors that the US is thinking about removing its troops from Syria, where it illegally occupies a third of the country, (and steals their oil and wheat), and Iraq, where the Iraqi government has demanded that the US leave.

Remember when Trump tried to remove US troops from Syria? We were told then that that wacky Assad responded by gassing his own people, as if he wanted the troops to stay. Cause that makes sense. But it worked. The US remains in Syria today, occupying the oil-producing parts of Syria, which makes it easier to steal their oil.

I think that this announcement is the equivalent of that earlier response to the plan for withdrawal, probably orchestrated by the same people, or their cohorts. And Victoria Cookies Nuland announced that the US will not leave Syria (on her way to Kiev to give the imperial marching orders to Zelensky.)

The war machine can't stop, won't stop. The looting will continue, until another force puts a stop to it.

NATO and Kiev killing civilians in Russia

When the Chechens and the DPR militias were liberating Mariupol last May, I saw a video where some Chechens talked about how they were not supposed to attack a stronghold building of Kiev regime forces.

But a woman and child who were being held hostage escaped from the building and made a run for safety.

A sniper shot the woman in the head. Her son stopped, distraught, crying, and unwilling to leave his mother.

The Chechens were calling to him to Run! Run!, but the sniper then shot the little boy right in front of them.

That is when they disobeyed their orders and stormed the building.

They took a lot of casualties, but they got the Azov monsters, and rescued some more hostages.

I bring this up because the Kiev regime shelled Donetsk City again, on New Year's Eve, killing more civilians. Why would they do such evil deeds?

Putin was asked why the Russians don't respond to the atrocities the Kiev regime and their controllers commit.

He answered "Targeted attack on the civilian population. Of course, this is a terrorist attack. Should we respond like this? Of course we can. We can hit the squares in Kiev and any other city. Denis, there are children walking there, mummies with strollers. I understand... I'm seething myself. I want to ask you something. Do we need to do this?"

So everyone is seething at this atrocities, and many people want to respond in kind.

Is this why they continue, to push Russia into killing civilians?

Ukrainians are apparently starting to wake up and realize just who is calling the shots here (no pun intended, I mean that literally.) They see crazed psychopaths like Haley and Graham slavering over dead Ukrainians "The best investment we ever made." They are getting sick of this, and they are starting to see Russia as liberating them, instead of invading them, according to some people who monitor Ukie social media.

The only way to get them back into line is to commit a massive atrocity, something the US is extremely experienced at doing. Then pull out all the stops on the Mighty Wurlitzer, and try to whip the Ukies into some sort of post-9-11 American frenzy.

I think that is the plan.